The Latest

Sep 11, 2014 / 218 notes
lushmeuse:

"Adam" (09.05.14)Model:  Rahm Bowen
Sep 8, 2014 / 9 903 notes

lushmeuse:

"Adam" (09.05.14)
Model:  Rahm Bowen

(via blackfashion)

Sep 4, 2014 / 25 018 notes

(via parahnoid)

Sep 4, 2014 / 84 802 notes

(via parahnoid)

liftedandgiftedd:

this is fucking gold
Sep 4, 2014 / 193 864 notes

liftedandgiftedd:

this is fucking gold

(via sexcake)

Sep 4, 2014 / 221 notes

(via skycream)

Aoû 9, 2014 / 6 377 notes

skunkbear:

So photographer David Slater wants Wikipedia to remove a monkey selfie that was taken with his camera. As you can see from this screen shot, Wikipedia says no: the monkey pressed the shutter so it owns the copyright.

We got NPR’s in-house legal counsel, Ashley Messenger, to weigh in. She said:

Traditional interpretation of copyright law is that the person who captured the image owns the copyright. That would be the monkey. The photographer’s best argument is that the monkey took the photo at his direction and therefore it’s work for hire. But that’s not a great argument because it’s not clear the monkey had the intent to work at the direction of the photographer nor is it clear there was “consideration” (value) exchanged for the work. So… It’s definitely an interesting question! Or the photographer could argue that leaving the camera to see what would happen is his work an therefore the monkey’s capture of the image was really the photographer’s art, but that would be a novel approach, to my knowledge.

Jui 8, 2014 / 326 069 notes

(via gnarly)

theclassyfitness:

Italian Chicken Pasta - | via Tumblr a We Heart It-on - http://weheartit.com/entry/120052299
Jui 8, 2014 / 1 460 notes

theclassyfitness:

Italian Chicken Pasta - | via Tumblr a We Heart It-on - http://weheartit.com/entry/120052299

(via freshkings)

sexlane:

reals:

Black Python | Photographer


.
Jui 8, 2014 / 11 175 notes

sexlane:

reals:

Black Python | Photographer

.

(via sexlane)